Coro Fellows Examine Critical Issues in Oakland
| Cici Vu, FPPA class of 2010 |
 |
As an Oakland outsider, I came to the Oakland City Council meeting on October 6th with few expectations but with much intrigue. The Fellows and I had a brief induction to transportation issues through interviews with three leaders in Bay Area transportation the Friday before, so we were prepared with some background knowledge on the controversial issues. |
|
From the interviews, we learned that two controversial topics were being heavily debated –the BART connector to the Oakland Airport and parking in downtown Oakland. The transportation authorities and BART favored the BART connector and community groups such as TransForm were against it. I recall thinking to myself, “Why would anyone be against building transportation infrastructure which is much needed in the Bay Area?” I am a huge proponent of public transportation infrastructure for the environmental and social benefits it would bring.
I came to the city council meeting with anticipation, wanting to learn more about the politics in Oakland, particularly surrounding the transportation issue. At the meeting, we witnessed democracy in action, but I felt a sense of frustration at the slow pace of the meeting. Part way through the meeting, the Coro Fellows were escorted into the Council President’s room and had an impromptu debate with the leading advocates on each side of the issue. It was fascinating to have the opportunity to have a deeper dialogue and hear them respond to each other’s remarks.
From these side conversations with the Director of TransForm and other community members during the meeting, I answered my own question with a new question. The pot of stimulus money allotted to the community of Oakland would be usurped by the BART connector project if the resolution to reject it failed –there would be nothing left for city-wide transit or other community needs. Was this an equitable application of the stimulus funding during these hard economic times? |
| Check out photos of the Oakland City Council meeting. |
|
|